Michael Ashby

Discussing the Concerns of the Canadian Pardon and US Entry Waiver Industry in Canada

President of National Pardon

Bill C23B set to pass, Part of Omni Bus Crime Bill

September 21st, 2011 Filed in pardon by Michael Ashby

23 Comments / Add A Comment

With the Conservative Majority government having submitted the Safe Streets and Communities Act, also known as the Omni Bus Crime Bill, it is now a near certainty that Bill C23B an act to eliminate pardons for serious crimes will be passed. Bill C23B is just one of 9 bills included in the new crime bill that the Conservatives are intent on passing within 100 sitting days of parliament. The new bill is Bill C10.

So what does all this mean for people who have not yet been granted a pardon?

There are a few measures in the bill that could potentially affect you very seriously. Some will have no effect whatsoever.

The term pardon is sure to be swapped for the term record suspension. This is meaningless. If you are still eligible for a record suspension then it will mean exactly the same thing as a pardon. So call it whatever you like. I am quite certain the term pardon will continue to be widely used anyway.

Waiting periods will change to 5 years for summary offences and ten years for indictable offences.

Perhaps the worst measure in this bill is that people with more than three indictable offences will no longer be eligible for a pardon. The number of solid upstanding people I have talked to who turned their lives around is beyond counting. Many of them had more than three indictable charges on their record.

Pardons will no longer be accessible for anyone with a sexual related offence against a minor. This seems like a very reasonable measure until you hear stories of someone in their early 20’s having sex with his/her 17 year old girlfriend/boyfriend. Does it really make sense to label these people child sex offenders for the rest of their lives?

The other measure that is likely to come into effect but is not actually a part of the legislation is that the fee for a pardon is set to increase dramatically to $631, unless the Conservatives come up with another odd number. At the moment the fee payable to the Parole Board is $150.

If you have any questions about record suspensions or other matter relating to the removal of criminal records you can email me anytime.

Michael Ashby

mashby@nationalpardon.org

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller

Canadians With Mental Illnesses Denied U.S. Entry

September 9th, 2011 Filed in Border Crossing, US Waiver, US entry waiver by Michael Ashby

No Comments / Add A Comment

 One of the more shocking things I have experience working at the National Pardon Centre is the stories of people with illnesses being denied entry to the United States even though they are crossing the border to seek medical treatment. It is hard to imagine a more callous and inhuman application of border protection rules than denying a sick person medical treatment because of an old criminal record. The article posted below from the Huffington Post shows how this problem is taken to a new level when border guards are refusing people entry based on medical records that are not even criminal convictions.

Please read the original article by clicking the following link to the Huffington Post website. Otherwise it is reprinted below.

 http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/09/09/canadians-with-mental-ill_n_955115.html?ref=email_share

More than a dozen Canadians have told the Psychiatric Patient Advocate Office in Toronto within the past year that they were blocked from entering the United States after their records of mental illness were shared with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Lois Kamenitz, 65, of Toronto contacted the office last fall, after U.S. customs officials at Pearson International Airport prevented her from boarding a flight to Los Angeles on the basis of her suicide attempt four years earlier.

Kamenitz says she was stopped at customs after showing her passport and asked to go to a secondary screening. There, a Customs and Border Protection officer told Kamenitz that he had information that police had attended her home in 2006.

“I was really perturbed,” Kamenitz says. “I couldn’t figure out what he meant. And then it dawned on me that he was referring to the 911 call my partner made when I attempted suicide.”

Kamenitz says she asked the officer how he had obtained her medical records.

“That was the only thing I could think of,” she says. “But he said, no, he didn’t have my medical records but he did have a contact note from the police that [they] had attended my home.”

Stanley Stylianos, program manager at the Psychiatric Patient Advocate Office, says his organization has heard more than a dozen stories similar to Kamenitz’s.

The office has also received phone calls from numerous Canadians who have not yet had encounters with U.S. customs officers, but are worried that their own mental health histories may cause security delays while travelling south of the border for business or family trips.

‘This is an issue’

“We get calls from people who have concerns about being stopped because they know this is an issue,” Stylianos says.

So far, the RCMP hasn’t provided the office with clear answers about how or why police records of non-violent mental health incidents are passed across the border.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security did not respond to a CBC News request for comment.

According to diplomatic cables released earlier this year by WikiLeaks, any information entered into the national Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC) database is accessible to American authorities.

Local police officers take notes whenever they apprehend an individual or respond to a 911 call, and some of this information is then entered into the CPIC database, says Stylianos. He says that occasionally this can include non-violent mental health incidents in which police are involved.

In Kamenitz’s case, this could explain how U.S. officials had a record of the police response to the 911 call her partner made in 2006, after Kamenitz took an overdose of pills.

RCMP Insp. Denis St. Pierre says information on CPIC not only contains a person’s criminal record, but also outstanding warrants, missing persons reports and information about stolen property, along with information regarding persons of interest in ongoing cases. It also can contain individuals’ history of mental illness, including suicide attempts.

The database contains anything that could alert authorities to a potential threat to public safety and security, and all CPIC information is available to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, St. Pierre says.

But he says the golden rule is that an officer searching CPIC must contact the police service where the record originated before acting on any information from the database.

9.6 million records

According to an RCMP website, the CPIC database stores 9.6 million records in its investigative databanks.

The RCMP and U.S. law enforcement agencies provide reciprocal direct access to each other’s criminal databases in order to stem the flow of narcotics and criminal dealings into North America, according to the WikiLeaks cable.

When asked about the sharing of police information for security purposes, Kamenitz says the government is “obviously not considering what the impact of that can be and how much that can alter a person’s life.”

“Police may have attended my home,” says Kamenitz, “but it was not for a criminal matter; it was a medical emergency.”

Kamenitz notes that suicide isn’t a criminal offence in either country.

“It speaks to the myth we still hold,” Kamenitz says, “that people with a mental illness are violent criminals.”

At less than five feet tall, with a debilitating form of arthritis that makes it impossible for her to complete daily tasks like cooking and dressing without assistance, Kamenitz says she is hardly a threat to U.S. Homeland Security.

‘I am not a criminal’

“I’ve been battling not only anxiety and depression but also chronic pain since my teen years,” Kamenitz explains. “I am not a criminal.”

Kamenitz was eventually allowed to board a plane to Los Angeles, four days after missing her initial flight. But in order to do so, she had to submit her medical records to the U.S. and get clearance from a Homeland Security-approved doctor in Toronto, who charged her $250 for the service.

Included in the Homeland Security forms Kamenitz was required to fill out were questions about whether she had a history of substance abuse and whether she had diseases, such as AIDS or tuberculosis.

“These are private and personal medical records that I’m now handing over to a foreign government,” she says.

After years of private therapy and help from doctors at St. Michael’s Hospital and the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto, Kamenitz says the border incident felt unjust.

“It was discrediting all the efforts that [I had] made to recover.”

Stylianos says Canadians should be outraged that people’s mental health information is shared across the border.

It is an intensely private matter for many individuals,” he says.

‘You can’t control it’

Stylianos says his organization is lobbying for this information not to be included in the CPIC database or shared with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security as part of a routine border screening process.

“Once that information gets into the American system, you can’t control it,” he says.

According to the same diplomatic cable released by WikiLeaks, which included data from 2004 and 2005, Americans believed that despite the open database sharing, “Canada’s strict privacy laws” have limited the timely exchange of information between the two nations.

In the 10 years since the Sept. 11 attacks, the two countries have struggled to come to an agreement on how best to police the border.

The administrations of Prime Minister Stephen Harper and President Barack Obama are in talks over a perimeter security deal that would include further cross-border intelligence-sharing as part of a joint border security strategy.

In an Aug. 29 news conference in Toronto, Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird told reporters that the privacy rights of Canadians remain top-of-mind during discussions about cross-border law enforcement programs.

“Our sovereignty cannot and will not be compromised,” he said.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller

One of my favourite thank you letters!

September 7th, 2011 Filed in Canadian Pardons, pardon by Michael Ashby

No Comments / Add A Comment

I don’t usually post emails or letters from clients but I just couldn’t resist with this one. Every now and then I come into my office, sit down at my computer and get to start my day with a morning smile. Today this one was it.

Hi all;

I received the copy of my pardon documents today.  When you destroy the remaining documents at your office, would it be possible to shout “BOOYAH!” on my behalf?  Thanks again for everything and have a great day!
 

Nothin’ but sweet, sweet love;

John

“Before Elvis, there was nothing.” –
John Lennon

What if the ‘Hokey Pokey’ really IS what it’s all about?- ANONYMOUS

“We all enter this world the same way: Naked; screaming; soaked in blood.  But if you live your life right, that kind of thing doesn’t have to stop there.” – DANA GOULD

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller

Crime bill won’t help victims, say advocates

August 31st, 2011 Filed in pardon by Michael Ashby

No Comments / Add A Comment

We have seen a lot of criticism from the Canadian public concerning the omnibus crime bill that is to be introduced in the fall, so much that it almost seems pointless to mention it. The legislation is so bad that most Canadians are just willing to accept it is an inevitability we can do nothing about. The following article is critical of the bill from the point of view of the “victims”, a catch word our government likes to us ad nauseum. So here it is. Please read the original article on the Ottawa Citizen website. Otherwise it is included below:

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Crime+bill+help+victims+advocates/5331087/story.html

The Conservative government’s omnibus crime legislation to be introduced this fall may put too much focus on offenders, leaving victims in the dark, crime victims advocates say.

The legislation, likely to be sweeping in scale and scope, will be bundled into omnibus bills that represent a larger group of about a dozen bills the government was unable to pass in the previous minority Parliament.

Advocates for victims of crime are concerned the bill – expected to dramatically expand mandatory minimum sentences for certain drug crimes, harshen sentencing for certain sexual offences against children and affect the privacy of young offenders – puts more weight on punishment than prevention, and won’t go far enough to help victims.

The government has said harsher sentencing will help victims of crime by ensuring offenders stay off the streets and behind bars.

But the answer isn’t that simple, said Sue O’Sullivan, the federal ombudsman for victims of crime.

“It’s not an ‘either/or,’ ” she said. “It’s a balance. And what’s missing is that attention to victims of crime. The legs of the stool aren’t equal right now.”

O’Sullivan, the former deputy chief of Ottawa police, is the second ombudsman in the office, which Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s government created in 2007.

When it was launched it was given a mandate to help victims of crime – individually and collectively – access federal programs, address their complaints about federal programs and increase awareness among criminal justice policy-makers of the needs and concerns of victims.

Funding for the office has been steady – it continues to receive an approximately $1.5-million annual budget, the same as when it was launched.

But because the office has no legislative power, it has to go through the Justice Department to get important reports tabled or to make funding requests.

In 2007, the Conservatives committed $13 million per year for four years through the Federal Victim Strategy, a package of programs and services that included the creation of the ombudsman’s office. The government renewed funding for the strategy and the ombudsman’s office in the 2011 budget.

But the money being funnelled into the government’s crime agenda is off-balance, leaning steeply toward offender-management instead of victim-management, Sullivan said.

To help balance the funding, former ombudsman Steve Sullivan, in his new role as executive director of Ottawa Victims Services, submitted three recommendations for the 2012 pre-budget consultations, a process through which Canadians can present funding ideas for the minister of finance to consider while developing next year’s budget.

In October 2010, the government decided to establish a $5-million, five-year fund to help support the growth of Child Advocacy Centres – something the ombudsman’s office had asked for a year prior. But the day before the justice minister announced funding for those centres, the public safety minister had announced $150 million in prison spending.

Sullivan had noted the government had been idling on a commitment it made in the 2010 Throne Speech, to make victim fines surcharges necessary, something the current ombudsman is pushing for.

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen
Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Crime+bill+help+victims+advocates/5331087/story.html#ixzz1Wc8ZgVFW

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller

Entries RSS - and - Comments RSS

Fontsforweb.com - free web fonts download. See this Wordpress fonts plugin